APAC CIO Outlook
  • Home
  • CXO Insights
  • CIO Views
  • Vendors
  • News
  • Conferences
  • Whitepapers
  • Newsletter
  • Awards
Apac
  • Agile

    AI Healthcare

    Artificial Intelligence

    Aviation

    Bi and Analytics

    Big Data

    Cloud

    Cyber Security

    Digital Infrastructure

    Digital Marketing

    Digital Transformation

    Digital Twin

    Drone

    Internet of Things

    Low Code No Code

    Networking

    PropTech

    Remote Work

    Singapore Startups

    Smart City

    Startup

    Unified Communication

    Wireless

  • E-Commerce

    Education

    FinTech

    Healthcare

    Manufacturing

    Pharma and Life Science

    Retail

    Travel and Hospitality

  • Dell

    IBM

    Microsoft

    Salesforce

    SAP

  • Cognitive

    Compliance

    Contact Center

    Corporate Finance

    Data Center

    Data Integration

    Digital Asset Management

    Full Stack Development

    HR Technology

    IT Service Management

    Managed Services

    Procurement

    RegTech

    Travel Retail

Menu
    • SAP
    • Aviation
    • HR Technology
    • Manufacturing
    • Cloud
    • Data Center
    • Education
    • Salesforce
    • Digital Infrastructure
    • Bi and Analytics
    • Unified Communication
    • IBM
    • AI
    • MORE
    #

    Apac CIO Outlook Weekly Brief

    ×

    Be first to read the latest tech news, Industry Leader's Insights, and CIO interviews of medium and large enterprises exclusively from Apac CIO Outlook

    Subscribe

    loading

    THANK YOU FOR SUBSCRIBING

    • Home
    • News
    • Sensor Tech
    Editor's Pick (1 - 4 of 8)
    left
    Leveraging Data to Unlock New Business Opportunities

    Carlos Sanchez, CIO, SUEZ Water Technologies & Solutions

    The Industry Demands Quick Upgrade into Cloud

    Andy Nallappan, VP & CIO, Global Information Technology, Avago Technologies

    Multi-IMSI Ecosystem: A Revolution in International Roaming

    Nigam Shah, CIO & SVP - Cloud Services, Roamware

    Disruption in Wearable Medical Device Development

    Ben Donnet, Chief Technology Officer, Neuroworks Labs Pty Ltd

    Flexible Batteries Are Unleashing the Power of Smart Wearables

    David Yeung, Co-Founder & CEO, Lionrock Batteries Limited

    Impact of Cognitive Automation on Employment

    Utpal Chakraborty, Head of Artificial Intelligence, YES BANK LTD., AI Researcher

    You Can't Be Everywhere, Or Can You? Simplified Remote Monitoring

    Thomas Dewar, Executive Director of Information Technology, Lutheran Social Services of New York

    Collaboration is King for Innovative Wearable Technologies in B2C and B2B Markets

    Peter Düking, Strategic Business Consultant, Wearable Technologies AG

    right

    Reigniting Innovation - Is it Time for a New

    David Cropley, Associate Professor of Engineering Innovation, University of South Australia | Tuesday, December 20, 2016

    Tweet

    The launch, by the Soviet Union, of Sputnik 1 in October 1957 is a key event in the history of creativity and innovation. The so-called Sputnik Shock that reverberated through the West, and in particular, the United States, resulted in an immediate search for an explanation – how could the Soviets win this first leg of the space race, when the US was so superior, both technologically and culturally? Attention quickly turned to engineering – not only were DARPA and NASA established in the wake of Sputnik, but the US Congress enacted the National Defense Education Act in 1958, designed to stimulate math and engineering education at universities. However, the underlying issue was this – the US and other Western countries had assumed that their quantitative superiority – greater numbers of more highly educated engineers – was their inherent advantage. Sputnik, however, turned attention to a more qualitative explanation that focused on creativity – an assumption was that the Soviets must have more "creative" engineers! This change in mindset was critical (even if the premise was false), as it represented a shift from a quantitative explanation to a qualitative one. In effect, leaders in the West started to realize that it was something "about" the engineers that mattered – some key characteristics, abilities and qualities – and not just their sheer numbers. That "something" was creativity, and the Sputnik Shock is now seen to have kicked off the modern creativity era, with a strong psychological focus on creative problem solving, and on what helps or hinders people in thinking and acting in a creative manner.

    The connection between creativity and innovation is critical. Creativity is concerned with a range of personal, organizational and cognitive factors that facilitate the generation of novel and effective ideas.

    Innovation is concerned with the wider process of exploiting those creative ideas to solve practical problems, address the effects of change, and to generate sustained economic growth. This connection suggests that if we want to measure and manage innovation, we must be able to measure those factors that are driving the process – and that means understanding the personal, organizational and cognitive inputs
      

     “Connection between creativity and innovation is critical, as it suggests that if we want to measure and manage innovation, we must be able to measure those factors that are driving the process.”
     

    Jump forward now to 2016. Innovation, which is fueled by a creative front-end, is typically measured by counting inputs such as R&D dollars, number of staff, time dedicated to training, and number of strategic alliances, and outputs such as market share, profit, stock price, and annual sales. Even if we find a correlation between an input like number of staff and an output like annual sales, it doesn't take too long to start asking why? Why does the number of staff in an organization link to annual sales (if, indeed, it does)? Why does the R&D send link to stock price? While these measures certainly have value, not least because they are usually readily obtainable, like the leaders in the late 1950s, it doesn't take us long to shift from this quantitative view (how many?) to a qualitative view (why?). That qualitative view asks – what is it about the person – the human capital of the organization – that drives the innovation process?

    It's curious, therefore, that many measures of innovation remain anchored in a quantitative counting paradigm. Indeed, many measurement scientists would argue that this is not even real measurement. The quantitative paradigm in innovation measurement also has the disadvantage that outputs – or lagging – measures describe what has happened in the past. They are historical measures and they don’t tell us why things happened. If we wish to influence the future, then innovation management needs to adopt input, or leading, measures that not only describe what will happen – the capacity for innovation – but also indicate why.

    As a result, as it did in the late 1950's, after the Sputnik Shock, the conversation in innovation measurement and management needs to shift from quantitative explanations of innovation, to qualitative ones. What is it about the human capital of the organization that fuels the capacity for innovation? 

    Happily, there is extensive work on the psychology of creativity and innovation that addresses this issue. These inputs to the innovation process – the qualities of the individual; the cognitive mechanisms employed in idea generation and evaluation; the impact of the organizational culture and climate; the factors that make ideas novel and effective – are rigorously and objectively measurable (in the true sense of the word). However, perhaps we need a 21st Century Sputnik Shock to convince people that we can do better than merely counting and tallying simple, quantitative inputs and outputs in the hope that we will develop a deeper understanding of the drivers of innovation. Equipped with rigorous, validated measures of innovation inputs – the human capital – organizations can drive their innovation capacity to new levels, ensuring sustainable growth into the future

    See More: Top Sensor Technology Companies
    tag

    Sensor

    Weekly Brief

    loading
    Top 10 Automotive Technology Companies - 2019

    Featured Vendors

    Aptiv

    Kevin Clark, President & CEO

    Ambarella

    Fermi Wang, CEO

    ON THE DECK

    Automotive 2019

    Top Vendors

    Automotive 2018

    Top Vendors

    Previous Next

    I agree We use cookies on this website to enhance your user experience. By clicking any link on this page you are giving your consent for us to set cookies. More info

    Read Also

    Benefits of IT Compliance

    Geetest, The Company Behind BINANCE CAPTCHA, Launched A New Product Adaptive CAPTCHA

    Axie Infinity moves from Google reCAPTCHA to GeeTest

    IBM ESS 3500 System to Tackle AI Adoption Challenges

    Sustainable Development can Advance with the Support of Digital Public Technology

    IBM Expands Power10 Server Family to Address Changing Business Demands

    Loading...

    Copyright © 2022 APAC CIOoutlook. All rights reserved. Registration on or use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy and Anti Spam Policy 

    |  Sitemap |  Subscribe |   About us

    follow on linkedinfollow on twitter follow on rss
    This content is copyright protected

    However, if you would like to share the information in this article, you may use the link below:

    https://www.apacciooutlook.com/news/reigniting-innovation-is-it-time-for-a-new--nwid-3577.html